Disclaimer

These blog entries represent the views of their authors, not necessarily those of the CWRL, the University of Texas at Austin, or any of its affiliated entities.

Reply to comment

Existential Inquiry

I have to say that I am obsessed with the site and check it daily. Where the old Garfield was, as you put it, pretty lame, Garfield without Garfield is almost touching. You know, vaguely moving in an old French film sort of way. The blank panels, as you indicated, have an aural effect, a "silence" into which Jon speaks, in which he lives. In this way the reinvention is reminiscent of (or maybe just "is") found art that requires of the viewer a reevaluation of what is and is not art, what has and does not have Meaning.

That, and it's funny.

Reply

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments