viz.
Rhetoric - Visual Culture - Pedagogy
Tags
advertisement
advertising
architecture
art
assignment
Barack Obama
Comics
design
fashion
film
Hillary Clinton
Humor
In-class Exercise
information design
Iraq
Maps
news
Pedagogy
pedagogy examples
photography
photography
photography
Political Propaganda
politics
Propaganda
video
visual art
Visual Rhetoric
Writing Exercise
youtube
DisclaimerThese blog entries represent the views of their authors, not necessarily those of the CWRL, the University of Texas at Austin, or any of its affiliated entities. |
Reply to commentReplyYour contribution to the blog: Please Read Before PostingThe viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately. Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted. |
Recent comments
|
Fashion show as argument
I wonder if the shocked reaction to these designs stems from the genre in which they were presented—that of the fashion show. Reading through your post, I thought about the increasing number of films that deal with issues like the U.S.’s involvement in torture, but no one seems shocked or horrified by those portrayals. I wonder if, on some level, we just have to consider this type of fashion show as an argument; specifically, the only kind of public argument available to fashion designers. What is an outraged designer supposed to do to communicate that outrage? He or she can’t expect to get a lot of public traction out of holding a press conference. Instead, that outrage would be expressed in fashion, and negative reactions to it would likely stem from the fact that fashion is not widely considered an acceptable genre for arguments of this kind (because it is frivolous, or whatever). I don’t know if this was Galliano’s motivation, but certainly it should be considered.