Disclaimer

These blog entries represent the views of their authors, not necessarily those of the CWRL, the University of Texas at Austin, or any of its affiliated entities.

Reply to comment

On a more technical note,

On a more technical note, the digital photo spread is notable for how it animates the still photography. Parts of the photos are isolated and appear on the screen sooner than the rest of the image. A careful reading of the photos might reveal whether this animation is purely aesthetic or contributes to the argument of the essay. I'm leaning towards it being rhetorically significant, given what is isolated in each image, but haven't thought about it much more than that.

I disagree with the reading that this glorifies sexual violence. First of all, little of what's shown is in any way glorious and, to boot, there is a pretty clear commentary, as Melanie notes, through the placement of American flags.

Reply

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Your contribution to the blog: Please Read Before Posting

The viz. blog is a forum for exploring the visual through identifying the connections between theory, rhetorical practice, popular culture, and the classroom. Keeping with this mission, comments on the blog should further discussion in the viz. community by extending (or critiquing) existing analysis, adding new analysis, providing interesting and relevant examples, or by making connections between that topic and theory, rhetoric, culture, or pedagogy. Trolling, spam, and any other messages not related to this purpose will be deleted immediately.

Comments by anonymous users will be added to a moderation queue and examined for their relevance before publication. Authenticated users may post comments without moderation, but if those comments do not fit the above description they may be deleted.

Recent comments